Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 8 - Jul 13
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
Outer Tie Rod End Set (Female) for Mazda CX-5 (KF) - TR06535Vehicle Fitment & Part Details This outer tie rod end set (female) is listed for the Mazda CX 5 KF (2017 ), cross referenced to OE K123 32 280. It is supplied with 13. 6 mm cone, 1 8 cone pitch, M14X1. 5 thread size 1, M12X1. 25 thread size 2, 148 mm length. Confirm compatibility by matching the listed fitment details and any OEM reference numbers supplied. Verify VIN engine. Key Details SKU TR06535 Component Outer Tie Rod End (Female) Position Front
Vehicle Fitment & Part Details
This outer tie rod end set (female) is listed for the Mazda CX-5 KF (2017-), cross-referenced to OE K123-32-280. It is supplied with 13.6 mm cone, 1/8 cone pitch, M14X1.5 thread size 1, M12X1.25 thread size 2, 148 mm length. Confirm compatibility by matching the listed fitment details and any OEM reference numbers supplied. Verify VIN/engine.
Key Details
- SKU
- TR06535
- Component
- Outer Tie Rod End (Female)
- Position
- Front Axle, Outer
- Configuration
- Set
- OEM References
- Mazda: K123-32-280
- Primary Fitment
- Mazda CX-5 KF (2017-)
- Specs
- 13.6 mm cone, 1/8 cone pitch, M14X1.5 thread size 1, M12X1.25 thread size 2, 148 mm length
Listing Highlights
- Listed for selected Mazda CX-5 KF applications shown in the fitment table.
- Front axle outer tie rod end (female type) with 13.6 mm cone, 1/8 cone pitch, M14X1.5 thread size 1, M12X1.25 thread size 2, 148 mm length.
Product Specifications
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Fitting Position | Front Axle, Outer |
| Type | Female |
| Cone Size | 13.6 mm |
| Cone Pitch | 1/8 |
| Thread Size 1 | M14X1.5 |
| Thread Size 2 | M12X1.25 |
| Length | 148 mm |
Vehicle Fitment
Includes 1 supplied application covering Mazda CX-5 KF. Use the full table below to confirm model, engine option and year range before ordering.
| Make | Model / Application | Year Range |
|---|---|---|
| Mazda | CX-5 (KF) 2.0 121kw (PEX3, PEXB, PEXP), 2.2 129kw (SHY6)(2017-), 2.2 140kw (SHY8)(2018-), 2.5 143kw (PYZ8, PYZC), 2.5 143kw (PY-VPS, PY-Y8, PY-ZA, PYZ8, PYZC) | 2017- |
Fitment Notes
- Always match OEM reference number(s) and vehicle details before ordering. Verify VIN/engine.
- Open-ended dates, such as "2017-", reflect supplier catalogue data and must be confirmed against the vehicle before ordering.
Compatibility Verification Notes
- Confirm compatibility using VIN, engine code, chassis / platform, OE reference and original part comparison before ordering.
- Match the supplied dimensions to your original part, including the 13.6 mm cone, 1/8 cone pitch, M14X1.5 thread size 1, M12X1.25 thread size 2, 148 mm length.
- This female outer tie rod end is supplied as a set. Confirm the type, position and quantity you require before ordering.
- Fitment data may vary by production date, market, import history and engine variant.
- This listing is for part identification and compatibility checking only. Installation must be carried out according to the vehicle manufacturer's service information by a suitably qualified person.
Common Questions
Will this outer tie rod end set (female) fit my Mazda CX-5 KF?
This part (TR06535) is listed for the fitments shown on this page. Confirm by matching the fitment details. Verify VIN/engine.
What OEM part numbers does this cross-reference?
Cross-reference numbers are listed in the Key Details section above. Match at least one to your original part before ordering.
Is this sold as a single unit or a set?
This listing is sold as a set. Confirm the quantity and type you require before ordering.
How do I confirm fitment if there are multiple variants?
Compare the supplied fitment details, thread and taper sizes, and original part details before ordering. Verify VIN/engine.
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.3 ★★★★★
Based on 735 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
Great Multi-Function Watch
Color: Gray/Digital/Gray
I absolutely love my Timex Ironman watches. I have had many over a very long period of time.
Wonderful set of functions for the price.
Very affordable.
Easy to use. Lasts a long time. Very easy to read in standard lighting. I like the Indiglo when needed, but do not use it too often.
Absolutely love the ability to set a repeat timer to remind me to do something at a fixed interval, or to keep me on task for a fixed period of time.
Great to be able to set three independent alarms.
Potential to capture a huge number of splits with the stopwatch.
I purchased this watch to replace a similar model with a dead battery. I have replaced batteries in the past, but it is quicker and easier to buy a replacement watch. I am saving my old watches for that day in the future when the Ironman model may no longer be available. I expect this will be my watch of choice for the rest of my life.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 21, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Just fine if you have simple needs...
Color: Black/Digital/Black/Green
Exactly what I needed: a cheap, durable wrist watch. The only thing it was lacking were instructions, but about 5 minutes of messing with the buttons got it set up
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 19, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Nice watch
Color: Black/Digital/Black/Green
Good watch
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 30, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Compared to g-shock?
Color: Black/Yellow
Firstly random public reviews can be comical…”it’s has a battery, terrible, One star” or “I don’t like yellow, one star” omg peoples do better. I’ll review this while comparing to an older style of g-shock from the same era. I’ll start by saying this timex rocks, for me in my mid 50’s it’s so retro and nastalgic, brings back memories, I may have even owned this model back in the day. What’s great about it- the display, larger digits than the typical g-shock and they are super crisp, clear and easy to read. The indiglo is awesome. This is the most accurate quartz watch I have aside from the atomic g-shocks that adjust themselves daily. I prefer a chunky watch and the g-shocks do a better job in that department. i feel this watch is rugged, but I’d still give the nod to g-shock in this department. 200M water resistance is the gold standard and this watch has it which I love for peace of mind for any water based activities. This is a 5 star watch at a great price. I still love some aspects of a g-shock better but its just preference.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 11, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Everybody loved the high-tech style and amazing functionality
Color: Black/Yellow
I'm not a Timex fanboy, and I've had my fair share of problems with the Expedition line, so this review is my honest opinion as a man who's worn Armitrons and Timexes since I was 10.
I remember in 1992 when the Timex Ironman Triathlon with Indiglo was first launched - My older brother got one, then me and my neighbor friends. Everybody loved the high-tech style and amazing functionality. Even Bill Clinton was rock'n this watch, for those who don't remember.
Quite simply, this is the perfect watch at a great price, in my opinion. Perfect as a gift for any man, and I think the original black/olive drab/yellow coloration is still the coolest. In this day and age of smartphones, it still pays to have this watch. The alarm is less annoying sounding than a cellphone, and doesn't wake up the entire house. To turn it off, just tap the watch, no more reaching for the phone or alarm clock. Timer comes in handy for anything; timing my kids' timeouts when they get in trouble, 15 minutes room clean-up times, etc. Chrono is fun for anything you wanna use a stop-watch for. I set the second time zone for Vietnam time. It really is a million times easier to use this watch for all of its functions than reaching for a smartphone or alarm clock, etc. If you;ve been relying on your phone for a few years as a watch/chronograph/timer/alarm - you'll be so glad you finally got a watch like this.
I've never tried a smart-watch, however I feel those are not as necessary,durable or practical as a real watch. Other Timex watches I've used were freakin' trash - couldn't throw em away fast enough. Might as well open the box while holding it over a trash can, so the watch can fall right in when you open the box. That's my experience with the Expedition line-up.
Back to this watch: The only thing I wish this watch could do is measure activity thermogenesis (calories expended throught the day) or work as a pedometer, which some smart-watches and other devices can do. I also cannott decide if I like this new, slightly larger, heavier/thicker design of the Ironman Triathlon over the 1990s design. The 90s models styling was "tight to death'. Star-split buttons were seperated. The mode button was yellow. Overall more compact and bi-cultural;by that I mean it looked great as an athletic watch or a politician, business man wathc. This new model is bigger, better ingress/shock resistance, and more of an athletic style over all, and is a little less colorful.
I almost went with the G-shocks, but they still just look like crap and are waay to expensive. Sure, they have some better features, can survive WWIII, but I am a traveler. I need a watch that can work in the dark in any environment. The G-shocks are often using some kind of solar battery crap and rely on cathing a signal from an American automic clock in Colorado - good luck with that while your in Thailand on vacation.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 31, 2016